Bitbucket tortoisehg unity3d3/19/2023 ![]() I don't think there's a single developer who doesn't know GitHub, the popular source-control web hosting service for Git. If I'm wrong and you never head about it I strongly suggest you to fill this huge gap by reading (at least) the GitHub and Git wikipedia pages. Taking a look to the and official site won't hurt either. If you know what I'm talking about, keep reading: you're most certainly aware that in order to use the GitHub service you need to adopt Git, which is not only the most used source-control manager (SCM from now on) of the current decade, yet also a very brilliant and innovative piece of work due to its distribuited, versatile and elegant approach. This will show a text file for every asset in the Assets directory containing the necessary bookkeeping information required by Unity. These - togheter with the GitHub project itself- are the reasons why it gradually crushed the competitors, including some very praised open-source industry standards such as CVS and SVN - which were based on a traditional, less-modern centralized SCM paradigm. This is done by selecting Edit->Project Settings->Editor in the application menu and enabling External Version Control support by selecting Visible Meta Files in the dropdown for Version Control. The almost-simultaneos diffusion of Mercurial (formerly HG), another distribuited SCM featuring tools and settings as neat as Git ones, with a generally better support for Windows platforms, software and developer frameworks.Īnother strong reason which favored Mercurial over Git on windows platforms was, in 2008, the launch of the website, entirely based on Mercurial (until 2011, when Git was adopted too) and very similar to GitHub in almost any way.a late win32 porting of the most used UI - msysgit e TortoiseGit among others - which tend to be preferred by most Windows developers who tend to despise a bare c ommand-line interface.Conversely, it's still slightly less popular between Windows users for the following reasons: While Git is widely adopted by either Windows and Linux developer communities, the latter certainly is its true love source - after all it was developed by a certain Linus Torvalds. I don't want to go further than that, let alone saying which SCM would be better and why: in my personal opinion, being an enthusiast of both Git and Mercurial, I think that they are two amazing products which - despite their slightly different architectural approach - are equally able to perfectly fullfill almost any modern developing scenario. To put it in other words, I don't think I ever missed one of them while working with the other one. If you're looking for a deeper analysis of the similarities and the differences between Git e Mercurial I strongly suggest you to start by reading these two excellent (despite their age) posts. The first one is practical, technical and analytic, whilst the latter is more theoretical and fun: just pick the one you feel most suited for your style, just like you'll often end up choosing your SCM. DVCS Analysis: Git and Mercurial (by Google tech).Interoperability between Mercurial and Git by using TortoiseHG Let's bring the main topic back: how to effectively use GitHub site & services with Mercurial instead of Git. The first question you could ask is: does it even make any sense? Why would we want to use a Git-related web host if we don't feel like adopting Git? Why don't just use BitBucket instead? #BITBUCKET TORTOISEHG HOW TO# Personally I never had to answer such a question for a long while - until a customer asked me to put his project repository on GitHub. A huge, widely distribuited, Mercurial-based repository. UPDATE: See this link for the resolution to my subrepo problem.Needless to say, changing SCM on-the-fly was not an option - we wouldn't want to lose the history, let alone re-configuring each and every developer client. SubRepoX folder.Ĭan anyone guide me to a working SubRepository scenario for TortoiseHg pushing to Bitbucket I suspect TortoiseHg is looking in there for changes.and not my. I noticed that there is now a folder for in the MainRepo folder for each of my subrepos. My problem is that the MainRepo does not detect any of the changes in my SubRepo. hgsub file, i have the following SubRepo1 =. My directory structure looks like this: (sibling and not child folders) MainRepo (to hold all subrepos) My problem now is that TortoiseHg/Mercurial does not pick up the changes in my subrepos. Mercurial to Bitbucket - Subrepository - Repository is unrelated error I had to arrange them in Tortoise as sibling Repos. I originally posted this question and found that Bitbucket does not support nested sub repos ( CORRECTION: Bitbucket was not the problem at all.potentially bad information or misunderstood what they meant by nested subrepo).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |